Asymmetric Partisan and Ideological Evaluations from Candidate Repositioning: A Randomized Experiment
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper explores partisan and ideological differences in evaluations of a hypothetical candidate who repositions after campaign (aka “flip-flopping”). study uses survey experiment with three randomized conditions sample 1338 respondents. The analysis includes average treatment effects results by 1) respondent’s party identification 2) preferred immigration policy position. I show that (without or labels) from liberal to the status quo conservative position is drastically penalized terms favorability, particularly Democratic However, respondents supported only modestly rewarded higher favorability ratings for repositioning. Drastic also existed evaluations. viewed as more than are Republican conservative. These suggest used initial, form strong prior when evaluating candidate; whereas, were sensitive reposition.
منابع مشابه
Partisan mail and voter turnout: results from randomized field experiments
Political campaigns currently make extensive use of direct mail, particularly in state and local races, yet its effects on voter behavior are not well understood. This essay presents the results of large-scale randomized field experiments conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey during state and municipal elections of 1999. Tens of thousands of registered voters were sent from zero to nine piece...
متن کاملEvidence from a Randomized Experiment
Cash transfer programs have become extremely popular in the developing world. There is a large literature on the effects of these programs on schooling, health and nutrition, but relatively little is known about possible impacts on child development. This paper analyzes the impact of a cash transfer program on cognitive development in early childhood in rural Nicaragua. Identification is base...
متن کاملEvidence from a Randomized Experiment in Mexico
The paper will use the data from the PROGRESA evaluation to show the extent to which such a programme crowds out private transfers. An interesting aspect of the paper is the fact that it can use the randomization (one-third of the villages in the sample were randomized in the programme for evaluation purposes).
متن کاملBridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation.
Three studies link resistance to probative information and intransigence in negotiation to concerns of identity maintenance. Each shows that affirmations of personal integrity (vs. nonaffirmation or threat) can reduce resistance and intransigence but that this effect occurs only when individuals' partisan identity and/or identity-related convictions are made salient. Affirmation made participan...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Open journal of political science
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2164-0505', '2164-0513']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2023.132013